Disclaimer: This dissertation has been written by a student and is not an example of our professional work, which you can see examples of here.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this dissertation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKDiss.com.

Development of Real-time Warning Systems for Landslides

Info: 3670 words (15 pages) Dissertation
Published: 12th Dec 2019

Reference this

Tags: GeologyEnvironmental Science

The Literature Review


Landslides are defined as the downward movement of slope-forming materials under the influence of gravity (Highland & Bobrowsky, 2008) which can be considered as a high negatively impacting geological hazard on the socio-economic conditions (Baum & Godt, 2010; Petley, 2012). Rainfall is the most common triggering mechanism of landslides (Song, Chae, & Lee, 2016; Tu, Kwong, Dai, Tham, & Min, 2009), hence it is of prime importance to develop real-time warning systems to manage risk and minimize the impact of landslides triggered by rainfall. However, the state of knowledge and resources available to issue real-time warnings of rain-induced landslides varies across the globe. Existing warning systems against rainfall-induced landslides are based on rainfall threshold for an area or deformation of a slope, in which only the latter is based on the characteristics of a slope such as geometry, rainfall infiltration characteristics, and mechanical characteristics of the slope (Sasahara, 2017), which varies more spatially. Therefore this study set out to investigate the usefulness of such physical parameters in producing a real-time warning for rain-induced individual landslides.


Downslope mass movement in a natural or man-made slope is referred as landslides which can either be rotational or translational slides. This includes several typical failure processes such as slides, falls, and flows for which the basic triggering mechanisms be rainfall, earthquakes, snowmelt, vibration, and differential weather conditions (Highland & Bobrowsky, 2008).

Rain-induced Landslides

Rainfall is regarded as a predominant triggering mechanism of landslides (Lee, Gofar, & Rahardjo, 2009). Rainfall precipitation leads to a reduction of matric suction and hence the shear strength of the soil is reduced increasing the possibility of slope failure (Li, Tham, Yue, Lee, & Law, 2005). Apart from that, a positive pore water pressure can be developed under heavy rainfall conditions, that may also result in further reduced shear strength thus triggers slope failures landslides (Lee, et al., 2009).

There is a number of prevention and mitigation methodologies have been established against rainfall-induced landslides. Even though retaining walls and ground anchors are used in the prevention of slope failures, the application is limited to large-scale slopes. However, the historical data claims that majority of landslides take place on a small-scale slope, where the application of mechanical reinforcements have lesser adequacy (Towhata & Uchimura, 2013). In such circumstances, “non-structural countermeasures, such as landslide monitoring and early warning” have been employed (Towhata & Uchimura, 2013).

Landslide Monitoring

Landslide monitoring is the fundamental step in landslide risk reduction, in which the existing and susceptible landslides are observed to produce data in order to forecast landslides using various parameters and techniques. Forecasting landslides involve in-depth analysis of all the monitored parameters

Most of the existing monitoring systems against rainfall-induced landslides are based on rainfall data, where rainfall thresholds have been defined on diverse geological and climatic conditions (Martelloni, Segoni, Fanti, & Catani, 2012). In such studies, Researchers attempted to evaluate the application of real-time rainfall data along with defined rainfall thresholds to produce landslide warnings, as in the La Honda, California (Wilson & Wieczorek, 1995) , Malaysian Peninsula (Lee, et al., 2009) and  Emilia Romagna, Italy (Martelloni, et al., 2012). Such existing literature is extensively focused particularly on developing algorithms for landslide warning based on real-time rainfall data and statistically defined rainfall thresholds.

For the statistical definition of thresholds Martelloni, et al. (2012) used cumulative rainfall data collected up to three days period for shallow ground movements while up to 240 days cumulative rainfall data for deep-seated movements.  The study involves the initial development of prototype thresholds, which were calibrated using “past georegistered and dated landslides” (Martelloni, et al., 2012). Even though the study develops simple and rapid operational early warning system for all types for landslides incorporating only the precipitation values as the input data, in Martelloni, et al. (2012) found that accuracy is limited as most such statistical models. Depleted accuracy due to lack of precision and integrity of archived historical landslide data, is not only often resulted in false warnings but also adversely influenced on calibration and validation of the model (Martelloni, et al., 2012).

Lee, et al. (2009) developed a model incorporating statistical analysis along with intrinsic soil properties to determine the critical rainfall pattern of failure for four soil types. The analysis results showed that there exist “a unique relationship between rainfall Intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curve, hydraulic conductivity function and Soil-water characteristic curve(SWCC) as the minimum suction value and the corresponding water content in soil under an extreme rainfall of any duration can be predicted through these correlations. The minimum suction value is an important input parameter in the computation of unsaturated soil shear strength” (Lee, et al., 2009). Also, the study concludes that the ratio of rainfall intensity to soil saturated permeability is the deciding factor in the determination of critical rainfall pattern of failure.

There is a considerable amount of literature has been published on numerical models that simulated rain-induced landslides. Tsaparas, Rahardjo, Toll, and Leong (2002) performed a numerical simulation to investigate the responses of a typical residual soil slope in Singapore to several hydrological parameters including rainfall distribution, the saturated permeability of soil, initial pore-water pressures and the groundwater table. Griffiths and Lu (2005) carried out an unsaturated slope stability analysis with steady infiltration using elastoplastic finite elements. A range of infiltration and evaporation rates were applied on two homogeneous slopes that consist of clay and silt. All the studies above concluded that the appropriate choice of rainfall patterns to be used for the design of an unsaturated soil slope has to be determined by taking into consideration soil characteristics and climatic conditions. Lu and Godt (2008) developed an analytical framework for the stability of infinite slopes under steady unsaturated seepage conditions. Two types of soil were considered in their framework, namely sandy soil and silty soil. They found that hillslope failures can occur above the water table under steady infiltration conditions for both sandy and silty soils. The most notable contributions in their framework were the inclusions of the suction stress and the changes in soil friction angle with depth, which were often omitted from the conventional slope stability analysis. It appears that an appropriate numerical or analytical model for the study of rainfall-induced slope failure should account for both unsaturated soil behavior and rainfall pattern parameters.

The rainfall pattern, however, is highly variable relative to geographical location and climatic condition. Under such circumstance, the rainfall-induced slope failure was commonly treated as localized problems in which studies carried out from different geographical regions might suggest different conclusions on the threshold rainfall condition for the slope failures. The threshold rainfall amounts and durations vary over three orders of magnitude nationwide and over an order of magnitude across small geographic areas such as a county or province. Antecedent moisture conditions also have a significant effect, particularly in areas that have distinct wet and dry seasons. Furthermore, the numerical simulation with the consideration of various rainfall patterns might result in an extremely rigorous and time-consuming analysis (Baum & Godt, 2010; Lee, et al., 2009).

Another approach for the prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides is linked with a continuous monitoring of hydrological and mechanical properties of the soil. Recent studies focusing on monitoring of slopes susceptible to shallow landslides (Baum, Godt, & Savage, 2010; Godt, Baum, & Chleborad, 2006; Godt et al., 2008; Springman, Thielen, Kienzler, & Fridel, 2013) demonstrated how monitoring techniques allow identifying the soil hydrological and mechanical conditions during shallow landslides triggering and some fundamental properties that are essential to characterize and model landslide development. Soil water content and pore water pressure are the basic soil features to be considered in the stability analysis of a slope during a rainfall event. In fact, soil water content and pore water pressure data from continuous monitoring of unsaturated soils have been revealed very useful to be implemented in different kinds of stability models, such as closed form equations based on a limit equilibrium analysis (Lu & Godt, 2008), physically based models (Baum, Savage, & Godt, 2008; Montrasio & Valentino, 2008) and Finite Element Models (FEM) (Cuomo & Della Sala, 2013; Springman, et al., 2013). In all these situations, it is required an accurate knowledge of the constitutive relationships which identify the main soil hydrological properties. In particular, the Soil Water Characteristic Curve (SWCC), which relates the pore water pressure and the water content, allows for the characterization of hydrological and also the mechanical behavior of usually unsaturated soils (Lu, Kaya, Collins, & Godt, 2013). Moreover, the hysteretic nature of (Fredlund, Sheng, & Zhao, 2011; Likos William, Lu, & Godt Jonathan, 2014; Lu, et al., 2013), linked to in-situ processes due to different drying and wetting cycles the soils suffer in natural conditions, determines the development of a main drying curve (MDC) and a main wetting curve (MWC), thus it can have practical implications on water movements in soil and on the mechanical behaviour of unsaturated soils in terms of deformation and shear strength (Likos William, et al., 2014).

In the most of models for rainfall-induced shallow landslides triggering conditions, only drying path parameters are considered and the hysteretic effects are generally neglected(Baum, et al., 2008; Park, Nikhil, & Lee, 2013). On the other hand, it is worth noting that the topsoil is under wetting process during rainfall infiltration, therefore neglecting the wetting path could affect the assessment of rainfall-induced shallow l andslide triggering mechanisms (Likos William, et al., 2014)

Gallage and Uchimura (2010) conducted model tests by subjecting laboratory scale soil embankment slopes to artificial rainfall until slope failure and concluded slope failure occurs near the toe of the slope with the saturation. Therefore physical based real-time monitoring and warning systems against slope failures extensively needed to focus on the displacement and pore water pressure near the toe of the slope (Gallage & Uchimura, 2010) which will be critically taken in to account in the determination of optimum sensor locations in the study, developing a low cost and reliable real-time warning system for rain-induced individual landslides.

Other than above mentioned systematic approaches for existing landslide warning systems, empirical knowledge on the slope failure during heavy rain is utilized, such as ground roaring, crack opening, muddy water ejection, emission of methane gas from underground and falling-down of stones (Towhata, Uchimura, & Gallage, 2005) however the reliability is of lesser degree since empirical data are mostly related to minor displacements of ground and impossible to monitor during heavy rains at night time. Also, the technology of using extensometers to monitor the slope displacements is employed, but the process is expensive, requires a larger space and not easy to handle by individual personnel. Hence recently developed low-cost inclinometers, which measure the slope rotation, can be employed to enhance the ease operation, cost-effectiveness, and reliability.

In the case of the recently developed technology of measuring rotation using inclinometers, it is important to establish inclinometer sensors in correct locations on an unstable slope to measure the deformation, as it is difficult to predict the most probable location of failure under heavy rainfall (Towhata & Uchimura, 2013). Also, instrument measures the angle of rotation to predict the slope movement and based on a predetermined degree of rotation, evacuation warnings will be issued when the reported rotation exceeds that given value. Hence depth of insertion of the inclinometer to the ground is also a considerable factor since the depth to the failure surface can be varied according to the mode of failure, which can either be shallow transitional or deep failure (Towhata & Uchimura, 2013). An improved sensor device for slope monitoring has been developed by Towhata and Uchimura (2013), known as a Miniature ground inclinometer, which detects the slope displacement of the ground by using tilt sensors at each depth. The same inclinometer is decided to be used in the study, developing a low cost and reliable real-time warning system for rain-induced individual landslides.

Since the technology of monitoring slope deformation using inclinometer is cost-effective (Towhata & Uchimura, 2013), a number of sensors can be inserted at several locations of the unstable slope rather than using a limited number of extensometers. But there is no evidence that, research studies were carried out to investigate the critical locations on the slope as well as the depth of insertion into the ground to establish tilting sensors in order to obtain reliable data to predict failure. Therefore it is a vital matter to optimize sensors locations and depth of monitoring in a slope, which will be addressed by the study developing a low cost and reliable real-time warning system for rain-induced individual landslides.


Baum, L., Savage, W. Z., & Godt, J. W. (2008). TRIGRS-A Fortran program for transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope-stability analysis, version 2.0, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1159, available at: http://pubs. usgs. gov/of/2008/1159. Retrieved from

Baum, R. L., & Godt, J. W. (2010). Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA. Landslides, 7(3), 259-272. doi: 10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0

Baum, R. L., Godt, J. W., & Savage, W. Z. (2010). Estimating the timing and location of shallow rainfall-induced landslides using a model for transient, unsaturated infiltration. Journal of Geophysical Research. Earth Surface, 115(3). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001321

Cuomo, S., & Della Sala, M. (2013). Rainfall-induced infiltration, runoff and failure in steep unsaturated shallow soil deposits. Engineering Geology, 162, 118-127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.05.010

Fredlund, D. G., Sheng, D., & Zhao, J. (2011). Estimation of soil suction from the soil-water characteristic curve. [Article]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(2), 186-198. Retrieved from https://gateway.library.qut.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,sso&db=afh&AN=57986737&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Gallage, C., & Uchimura, T. (2010, 2010). Investigation on parameters used in warning systems for rain-induced embankment instability. In: 63rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference (GEO2010).

Godt, J. W., Baum, R. L., & Chleborad, A. F. (2006). Rainfall characteristics for shallow landsliding in Seattle, Washington, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(1), 97-110. doi: doi:10.1002/esp.1237

Godt, J. W., Baum, R. L., Savage, W. Z., Salciarini, D., Schulz, W. H., & Harp, E. L. (2008). Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: Requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework. Engineering Geology, 102(3), 214-226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.019

Griffiths, D. V., & Lu, N. (2005). Unsaturated slope stability analysis with steady infiltration or evaporation using elasto‐plastic finite elements. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 29(3), 249-267. doi: doi:10.1002/nag.413

Highland, L., & Bobrowsky, P. T. (2008). The landslide handbook: a guide to understanding landslides: US Geological Survey Reston.

Lee, L. M., Gofar, N., & Rahardjo, H. (2009). A simple model for preliminary evaluation of rainfall-induced slope instability. Engineering Geology, 108(3), 272-285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.011

Li, A. G., Tham, L. G., Yue, Z. Q., Lee, C. F., & Law, K. T. (2005). Comparison of Field and Laboratory Soil–Water Characteristic Curves. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(9), 1176-1180. doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1176)

Likos William, J., Lu, N., & Godt Jonathan, W. (2014). Hysteresis and Uncertainty in Soil Water-Retention Curve Parameters. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(4), 04013050. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001071

Lu, N., & Godt, J. W. (2008). Infinite slope stability under steady unsaturated seepage conditions. Water Resources Research, 44(11). doi: doi:10.1029/2008WR006976

Lu, N., Kaya, M., Collins, B. D., & Godt, J. W. (2013). Hysteresis of Unsaturated Hydromechanical Properties of a Silty Soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(3), 507-510. doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000786

Martelloni, G., Segoni, S., Fanti, R., & Catani, F. (2012). Rainfall thresholds for the forecasting of landslide occurrence at regional scale. Landslides, 9(4), 485-495. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0308-2

Montrasio, L., & Valentino, R. (2008). A model for triggering mechanisms of shallow landslides. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 8(5), 1149-1159. doi: 10.5194/nhess-8-1149-2008

Park, D. W., Nikhil, N. V., & Lee, S. R. (2013). Landslide and debris flow susceptibility zonation using TRIGRS for the 2011 Seoul landslide event. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2833. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2833-2013

Petley, D. (2012). Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology, 40(10), 927-930. doi: 10.1130/G33217.1

Sasahara, K. (2017). Prediction of the shear deformation of a sandy model slope generated by rainfall based on the monitoring of the shear strain and the pore pressure in the slope. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 224, 75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.003

Song, Y.-S., Chae, B.-G., & Lee, J. (2016). A method for evaluating the stability of an unsaturated slope in natural terrain during rainfall. Engineering Geology, 210, 84-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.007

Springman, S. M., Thielen, A., Kienzler, P., & Fridel, S. (2013). A long-term field study for the investigation of rainfall-induced landslides. Géotechnique, 63(14), 1177-1193. doi: 10.1680/geot.11.P.142

Towhata, I., & Uchimura, T. (2013). Low-cost and Simple Early Warning Systems of Slope Instability. In K. Sassa, B. Rouhban, S. Briceño, M. McSaveney & B. He (Eds.), Landslides: Global Risk Preparedness (pp. 213-225). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Towhata, I., Uchimura, T., & Gallage, C. (2005). On Early Detection and Warning against Rainfall-Induced Landslides (M129). In K. Sassa, H. Fukuoka, F. Wang & G. Wang (Eds.), Landslides: Risk Analysis and Sustainable Disaster Management (pp. 133-139). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Tsaparas, I., Rahardjo, H., Toll, D. G., & Leong, E. C. (2002). Controlling parameters for rainfall-induced landslides. Computers and Geotechnics, 29(1), 1-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(01)00019-2

Tu, X. B., Kwong, A. K. L., Dai, F. C., Tham, L. G., & Min, H. (2009). Field monitoring of rainfall infiltration in a loess slope and analysis of failure mechanism of rainfall-induced landslides. Engineering Geology, 105(1), 134-150. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.11.011

Wilson, R. C., & Wieczorek, G. F. (1995). Rainfall Thresholds for the Initiation of Debris Flows at La Honda, California. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, I(1), 11-27. doi: 10.2113/gseegeosci.I.1.11

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this dissertation and no longer wish to have your work published on the UKDiss.com website then please: